Now, Cleveland had their own problems later in the game in that realm, which played into the Nets making a game of it, to some extent, in the closing minutes.īut, it was an encouraging for the Cavaliers, and to reiterate, Allen being back in the fold was an additional positive takeaway. The Nets had a 30-point first quarter, and were getting quality looks.įrom there, Cleveland largely controlled the contest, with a 38-point second quarter to boot, and Allen, Evan Mobley, Caris LeVert and the Cavs forced their share of turnovers. Allen had some rust, sure, but overall, he had a workmanlike outing in his return for the Cavs at the Nets.Īllen wasn’t quite as active in the early going of the contest on Tuesday, and the Cavs as a group had some problems getting on the same page on both ends. It was closer than it should have been in the first game of this latest miniseries for Cleveland, but the Cavs secured the 115-109 win from Donovan Mitchell’s star power, the teams’ defensive playmaking and a few huge runs.Ĭircling back, though, it was reassuring to have seen Allen back doing what he does, and while there’s room for improvement for the group and on the glass, he still made his presence felt throughout. Point being, it was meaningful for Allen to be back in the fold, and on Tuesday, he was once again, in a game at his former club, in the Brooklyn Nets, a potential playoff opponent. His interior presence on both ends of the floor is essential for the Wine and Gold, and he and Evan Mobley form one of the league’s best defensive duos. Having said that, Allen has proven to be a crucial player for Cleveland. The Cavaliers did go 3-1 without Allen in there, and the group did what they needed to do, to a large degree, to secure wins sans Allen in that chunk of games. Allen had missed Cleveland’s previous four outings with an eye contusion, in which he suffered on March 10 in a loss at the Miami Heat. ![]() It was relieving to see Jarrett Allen back in action for the Cleveland Cavaliers on Tuesday night.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |